tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post3359787330709339092..comments2023-06-17T08:57:56.835-04:00Comments on Stray Dogs That Amble In: Part IV: Astroturf Does Not Equal Grassroots. Real Feminist Series Part Five: Pete SeegerStray Yellar Dawg?http://www.blogger.com/profile/04861846247063603370noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-33787201020597621012009-01-30T19:12:00.000-05:002009-01-30T19:12:00.000-05:00Me too, that is, to see me here!You should see the...Me too, that is, to see me here!<BR/><BR/>You should see the response I got on my Jill Biden post on bloggy. Geesh, nobody's happy....lol.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-61650791412314376602009-01-30T18:58:00.000-05:002009-01-30T18:58:00.000-05:00What a great topic! The whole "bestest" ...What a great topic! The whole "bestest" campaign in the world has been run like a Madison Ave & GOP astroturf thinghie - I still remember when we used to laugh at the identical LTTEs praising Bush and the war.<BR/> And a yell from another Pete Seeger fan.Edgeoforeverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12715280247463212983noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-38775797941365525622009-01-30T12:52:00.000-05:002009-01-30T12:52:00.000-05:00Yep... it's a shame. But I am back on "moderate" n...Yep... it's a shame. But I am back on "moderate" now. Too much spamola.<BR/><BR/>Nice to see you here, VB!Stray Yellar Dawg?https://www.blogger.com/profile/04861846247063603370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-69436719925758878052009-01-30T12:41:00.000-05:002009-01-30T12:41:00.000-05:00Looks like a Botspam, I see that one everywhere :)...Looks like a Botspam, I see that one everywhere :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-3905420707848016932009-01-30T07:31:00.000-05:002009-01-30T07:31:00.000-05:00And the reason you are posting this here is???It's...And the reason you are posting this here is???<BR/><BR/>It's a moot point, BTW. And it is why Hillary took a paycut (from the one she voted on for Condi.)Stray Yellar Dawg?https://www.blogger.com/profile/04861846247063603370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5332274376330278254.post-49438004936412614472009-01-30T06:44:00.000-05:002009-01-30T06:44:00.000-05:00Lawsuit filed claiming Secretary of State Hillary ...<A HREF="http://bloggingredneck.blogspot.com/2009/01/lawsuit-filed-claiming-state-hillary.html" REL="nofollow"><BR/>Lawsuit filed claiming Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is constitutionally ineligible to serve</A><BR/><BR/>There were serious questions about the constitutional eligibility of Hillary Clinton to serve as secretary of State. The issue arises from a vote held to raise the Secretary of States salary. Senator Hillary Clinton voted for this increase. The Constitution forbids members of the Senate from being appointed to civil office, such as the Secretary of State, if the "emoluments," or salary and benefits, of the office were increased during the Senator's term.Bluegrass Pundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13692965298692361473noreply@blogger.com