“Now look, It’s all HER fault” (via Puma P.A.C.) UPDATE: Response from McCain, Graham, Ayotte

“Now look, It’s all HER fault”

Pretty much says it all.

I am SO DONE with the Obamacrat party. '

UPDATE: John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte response. 

STATEMENT BY SENATORS McCAIN, GRAHAM AND AYOTTE ON SECRETARY CLINTON’S COMMENTS THIS EVENING ON BENGHAZI ATTACK

October 15, 2012

Washington, D.C. ­– U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) today released the following statement on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s comments this evening regarding the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on September 11, 2012:

“We have just learned that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed full responsibility for any failure to secure our people and our Consulate in Benghazi prior to the attack of September 11, 2012. This is a laudable gesture, especially when the White House is trying to avoid any responsibility whatsoever.

“However, we must remember that the events of September 11 were preceded by an escalating pattern of attacks this year in Benghazi, including a bomb that was thrown into our Consulate in April, another explosive device that was detonated outside of our Consulate in June, and an assassination attempt on the British Ambassador. If the President was truly not aware of this rising threat level in Benghazi, then we have lost confidence in his national security team, whose responsibility it is to keep the President informed. But if the President was aware of these earlier attacks in Benghazi prior to the events of September 11, 2012, then he bears full responsibility for any security failures that occurred. The security of Americans serving our nation everywhere in the world is ultimately the job of the Commander-in-Chief. The buck stops there.  

Got the Book, Got the Message, Got the Fever!

Thanks Uppity!

Ordering a few more copies.

Woohoo! Rev. Amy reports that "Dirty Words on Clean Skin" has surpassed the sexist, media hyped "Game Change" on Amazon's watch list. Let the real herstory of 2008 be told!!

Hillary Clinton Took 10% of the Dem Primary Vote in NH!

Yes it's true.

It was done via a write-in effort. On the part of sane Democrats, no doubt.

That is all.

Now back to your regularly scheduled agenda, whereby the press pushes the "Romney is it" meme. And either exalts his accomplishments, or casts aspersions on his failures. Bah.

A Most Excellent Examination of the PUMA Mind

is put forth by Steve in KC at No Quarter.

To summarize by excerpting two of the more revealing paragraphs:

We all agree that there is much to despise about Obama, and a whole different set of things to despise about the people who helped get him elected. We all know what a liar he is, how lazy he is, how ill-equipped for the job he is, and how there are many things about his secret life that may legally disqualify him from being president, or should land him in prison. We agree on 98% of those things we hate about him.

But don’t expect me, or many others here, to share (the) recently-acquired aversion to the Clintons, or your recent (apparent) conversion to Republican conservatism. We have much we agree on, and we all are entitled to our opinions, but many of us here still support Hillary Clinton and think highly of her and her husband.

But really....go over and read the whole essay. It is one of the better examinations of the thought process that lurks behind PUMA paws.

This Might Be A Good Time to Remind Your Stupordelegates: "We Told You So"

And, just in case you can't remember which stupordelegates voted for whom...
Team Hillary has posted this "Told Ya So" page.

Please note that the link to Gov. Ted Strickland's page takes you, now, to Gov. Kasich.

Ohio will "take care of" Sherrod Brown (and whichever else turncoats are still in office) next election. No worries.

The Ultimate Hypocrite Rants About "Super-Congress" (Kinda like Super Delegates, only More Powerful. Huh?)

I won't link directly to the S.O.B. so I'll link you to Rev. Virginia's link to the most hateful man on Earth.

Yes, Keith-O... Remember the "Super-Delegates" you lurved so much?? Well the same model is now being used to create a "Super-Congress." To bypass the will of the people? Ya think??

Eff you, Keith Olbermann. And all your buddies, so succinctly remembered as BACKSTABBERS.

I wish I could have half as much hope as Lorac does in that second link. Half? Even a fraction ... :-{

SYD

If All Goes Well in Libya It's To Obama's Credit, If We Get Mired in Another War... That's Hillary's Fault

I ventured this "Hillary's to blame, Obama gets another peace prize" Libya hypothesis a couple of days ago, and posted it in response to a couple of the blogs I frequent.

This morning I find, fellow PUMA, D.K. Jamaal posting the substantiating evidence for my theory.

Yep... here we go again.... Mr. Sullivan is at it with his woman hate. (I won't even remind you of how he obsessed over Palin's uterus.)

Meanwhile... The Daily Beast offers a fairly positive summary of the "Women Who Called for War." But, believe me... in the end... Hillary (and to a lesser degree Susan and Samantha) will be blamed so that Obama can keep up his "great peacemaker" facade.

As that idiot Sullivan actually wrote:

"I don’t think it’s wrong for a President of the United States to issue an opinion about some madman like Gaddafi ...snip.... this initiative, this, this, this no-fly zone, this war essentially, is, is a Hillary-McCain concept."

Yes. Sullivan actually said that Hillary Clinton and John McCain cooked up the Libya no-fly zone while all Obama wanted was to *say* Gadaffi must go.

Un-effin-believable!

I Love James Carville, Even When His Jokes Are Crude (UPDATE: Carville is called four letter word: PUMA.)

He's one of the few Dem Party insiders that has the gall to say something like this:



And he's right, too. Metaphorically speaking.

H/T to Hillary is 44 for the video link.

UPDATE: "Let them be offended." (Carville refuses to apologize. Obots call him a four letter word: "PUMA.")

Looks Like Purple Was Worn By At Least *Some* In High Places, Yesterday

H/T Secretary Clinton Blog.

WTF? They can't get purple ties in DC?

As of 2008, "Historic" Only Matters if it is Man Making *His* tory.

As I responded to Legal Insurrection.

Why did our Leftie MSM talkers not talk about the "historic" nature of Hillary's winning the Primaries she did, for instance? Doncha know, it was all women's fault!

Of course, the Right is no better, as the "Sexism and Elitism Watch" continues.

It's just that I always expected more of the Left. Which is why I am so much more disappointed in their blind (or was it deliberate??) sexism.

Eff you both, Righties and Lefties.

I'm voting for women!

Of Course It's All True (Except the Part About Hillary Running in 2012.)

I Miss Bill and Hillary!

Poster H/T to Bloghopenchangery. (And... NO! I do not miss Bush or Carter. Not in the least.)

Oh... and I miss Hillary even more than her DH. Because... there *are* differences between Hillary and Barack, it turns out. (And we PUMAs always knew it.)

Sigh.

SYD

Need a job? Want to Hang Out With a Bunch of Barely Pubescent (acting) Boy Punks?

Politic USA is recruiting.

If you are really a smartass, you might even be invited to join the mostly white and predominantly male Journ-0-lists.

And.... if you really pander, Obama's advisors may reward you with an invite to the White House.

Though many PUMAs knew what was happening as early as the Democratic Caucus in Iowa ... and many Palin supporters got a clue after John McCain announced Sarah, in Ohio.... the whole truth about the smear campaign against two competent and intelligent women candidates for the White House is yet to be told.

REAL Feminists are all ears!

Give 'Em Hell, Hillary .... That's Right! (But, PUMAs, Let's Keep Clear About Who is "Palling Around With" British Petroleum)

The first six and a half minutes of this video is simply excellent:



But where the video goes wrong is when it deviates into anti-Palin hysteria at about 6.3.

The kind of drilling Palin has advocated is not “deep sea.” It is on land and in shallow, more manageable waters.

The problem is this… we can’t have it both ways. We can’t say we oppose Anwar drilling and then turn a blind eye to deep sea excavation in the Gulf. When the latter is, clearly, far more dangerous.

At any rate…. I'm posting this video to my blog. WITH RESERVATIONS. The first half or so is wonderful. But… I am not about to promote the demonization of Sarah Palin. There’s no reason for me to demonize her. She is not the one taking hundreds of millions from BP to line her own pockets. And… in Alaska… Sarah had Big Oil by the balls. Not the other way around.

We might also want to get curious about who else, besides Mr. Obama, is "palling around with" British Petroleum:

[...according to The Washington Post, the reputation of some left-wing environmental groups has also been polluted by the incident.

“[T]he Nature Conservancy lists BP as one of its business partners. The Conservancy also has given BP a seat on its International Leadership Council and has accepted nearly $10 million in cash and land contributions from BP and affiliated corporations over the years,” Joe Stephens wrote for the Post May 24.

It’s not just Nature Conservancy either, the Post found $2 million in donations to Conservation International and relationships between BP and other lefty activist groups Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Sierra Club and Audubon.]

Ooooohhhh.... so THAT explains the slow reactions of the "conservation" groups I have donated to! Infuriating!!

And maybe THIS little factoid from Mother Jones Earth News provides a glimmer into the Obama Administration's slow response???

Politico is following the BP money trail as well. And *guess who* is at the head of it? Hint: it's not Sarah Palin.

H/T to Hillary Unleashed for the video link. But, really.... jcjcd did us all a disservice... by turning it into an anti-Palin diatribe.

Redefine "POLARIZING:" A Call to Feminists and Linguists

It's time we re-define the word "POLARIZING" for the sake of all women candidates, past and future.

The call has been sounded at HILLBUZZ. Now let's take action!

Your mission, should you decide to accept it....

"We need to embrace it as a *good* word. Political parties are, inherently, POLARIZING. That is the way it will always be with a two party system. A candidate that moves people into the party is “polarizing” (aka MAGNETIC.)

In this scheme MAGNETIC and POLARIZING are synonyms. And who does not want to be MAGNETIC?

Obama is, in fact, *POLARIZING* by nature of the fact that he drew independents into the Dem party. He acted like a magnet in this sense. Why would that be a bad thing??

Oh, I forgot… it is *bad* if a woman does it. Like Hillary or Sarah. Such nonsense.

Reclaim the word and redefine it! That is the answer. “POLARIZING” = “MAGNETIC.”"

And further (from AFinch, in the same thread):

"Name a successful leader who hasn’t been “polarizing.” As fondly as people remember Reagan today, there was a distinct group of people who hated him while he was in office. Bill Clinton was described as polarizing. Think about it–Lincoln (whom Utopia likes to invoke when it is useful for him) presided over a country that was literally divided against itself. People who have strong beliefs, who have a clear vision of where they want to lead and who are not afraid to describe their vision in certain terms are naturally going to repel those with a different vision and different ideas. If Sarah Palin is repulsive to the Leftists and makes the contrast between them and the rest of us more clear, that is a good thing."

2010 will be a good year for project "POLARIZING means MAGNETIC" to make it's maiden voyage. Before 2012.... when we will have both parties, and all the boiz in the MSM, accusing primary (female) candidates.

Don't Blame Martha, She Voted for Hillary

Lynn Forester-de-Rothschild nails it with this piece, linked at The New Agenda. Anybody in their right mind knows that this is not about Martha being a "bad candidate." Or running a "bad campaign."

We now get a glimpse of *why* Martha stood for Hillary til the bloody end of the 2008 primaries. The genius of knowing her own constituants... and what they would back in the long run. Martha surely saw the huge losses coming for her party under Obama. Even in Bluest of Blue, Massachusetts.

But she tried anyway. For that I give her credit.

I hope she keeps trying, too. Just like Hillary.

Personally, I place this loss squarely on the shoulders of the man whose seat Brown will be taking. Ted Kennedy. And his buddy John Kerry. They knew who their constituants wanted at the top of the Dem ticket in 2008. But they backed the empty suit anyway. Eff you, Teddy and Johnny. Eff you both. And your little boiz club too.

SYD

Cartoon Credit: H/T PUMA Eyes.

Burn, Baby, Burn and Rise, Hillary, Rise (The Implosion of the Obamacrat Party and the Rise of the Phoenix.)

PUMA blogs this morning are picking up on a new hope! It's not the hopey-changey-kool-ade-bongy type of dope that the Obamacrat party shoved down our throats in 2008.

It has nothing to do with a hope based in empty rhetoric and back-sliding policies.

Because, just as Always For Hillary links to Heather Higgins:

"President Obama’s meetings at the Senate on Sunday, much like his visit to Copenhagen this week, are not indicators of inevitability; they are portents of panic. The reports coming out of the closed door, Democrats-only, meeting of internal divisions that are still irreconcilable, despite the high rhetoric of historic moment, only make the point more vividly: can you say 'desperation'?"

And Tennessee Guerilla Women bemoan the fact that it is our own Democratic party that has "Killed the Public Option."

The Confluence is on to the fact that the Clinton's have wrested a Massachusetts senatorship out of Kennedy-Obamacrat hands. Yes, Martha Coakley has triumphed over the preferred candidate of the Holy One and his minions.

Ms. Coakley took that special election by a bit of a landslide, according to The New Agenda which reported that as of 9:05 p.m., Coakley had 47% of the votes (Capuano 27%, Pugliuca 13%, Khazei 13%)

Why couldn't the Kennedy-Obamacrat party cram Capuana down the throats of the people of Massachusetts, you ask?

Well... there's this little matter of ongoing Race Baiting in the Obamacrat party. And the voter intimidation cover-up at the DOJ. Not to mention the the supreme distastefulness of Mr. Obama's minions in the press.

Somehow... the Obamacrat party has seriously misread the American people. Their little White House frat party is going up in flames.

My response?

"Burn, baby, burn. And Rise, Hillary, Rise."

Obama's War Vs. The Anti-War Movement's Fantasy

Bravo to Allesandro at the Daily PUMA. Well said!

Cept...

Oh wait... he didn't actually *vote* against the war... did he??

He more like put on a little song and dance in front of some anti-war protesters if I remember correctly...

While Hillary was standing at ground zero with a handful of her constituents' ashes...

Eff you, you Code Pink doofuses. And the cavalry, uh ... er, unity ponies you rode in on.

SYD

Carly, Lynn, Hillary, Sarah and Cynthia: Monster Slaying Women that Won't Back Down, Won't Give Up

The New Agenda carries Cynthia Ruccia's analysis of Lady Lynn Rothchild's re-emergence on the political scene. In conjunction with Carly Fiorina. Discussing Hillary and Sarah.

Five strong women with varying opinions on the issues, but in agreement on one point...

We must slay the political monster that is Sexism. Once and for all!

And speaking of slaying monsters.... HILLBUZZ is hoping for a Sarah victory. All around.

I couldn't agree more.

How The Media Boiz Imagine A Clinton/ Palin Summit

But the adult men of HILLBUZZ know better.

Oh and.... da pompous menfolk at ABC sure is full of Dem-self, tain't they: