"Just Tell Them...

I have worked 40 years to make the Women's Suffrage platform broad enough for Atheists and Agnostics to stand upon, and now if need be I will fight the next 40 to keep it Catholic enough to permit the straightest Orthodox religionist to speak or pray and count her beads upon."

Susan B. Anthony

Showing posts with label Women's Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women's Issues. Show all posts

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Why Binders and Big Bird Don’t Matter - Obama Sycophant, Gwen Ifill, wakes up... Begins to smell coffee?

Obama sycophant, Gwen Ifill, wakes up to the reality.....

Why Binders and Big Bird Don’t Matter - NationalJournal.com

 [Eyeing her, I realized she seemed to be just the sort of suburban woman that pollsters tell us both the Obama and the Romney campaigns are fighting over.

Russell had in fact voted for both the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and for President Obama — two big-time Democrats. But now, for the second time, she was working for Brown, a Republican.

Russell, it turns out, is among the legions of the long-term unemployed. 

“Well, I’m looking for a job, and I would like to stay in my community,” she told me. “And it’s turned out to be an immense chore. I’ve been offered jobs that are primarily part-time, and I’m concerned about my medical insurance, because I am paying an additional $400 a month for medical insurance, just in the past two years. So that frightens me.”

Russell also plans to vote for Romney. Why? I asked. She said with a little shrug, “My job. I need a job.”]

I seem to remember Ms. Ifill doing some servile slobbering in 2008.....


2008 VP Debate

Friday, July 16, 2010

What Feminism Could Do Better (While I am still away.)

Despite her backhanded mention of Sarah Palin (and make no mistake, Sarah *is* a Feminist) the author makes some interesting points about how the Left is losing it's grip on the word "Feminism." And why.

"Feminism should realign itself with social justice and avoid reducing all questions of women's lives to issues of sexuality and sexual behavior."

Friday, September 11, 2009

Millions of Girls Are "Disappeared" and Trafficked Into Brothels Each Year. Who Knew the U.S. Has A Government Program That Would Bring Them Here??


Thanks to No Quarter for keeping me up to the minute on the ACORN funds available for prostitution rings and brothels: HERE and HERE.

Am I losing my mind? There is actually a taxpayer financed, government program in the USA that would help someone traffic in 13 year old girls from El Salvador?

At the time that the stories above were breaking... I was sitting in a bookstore reading Half The Sky. After listening to this interview with the authors, Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. Their book is about the abysmal treatment of women, worldwide. Including the millions of girls that are trafficked into brothels every year.

I guess I was naive enough to believe that none of those girls could possibly be coming to the U.S.??

Shows what I know....

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Boston Boomer Asks "What Is Feminism?" (Part Six in my Real Feminist Series.)



Boston Boomer started this line of questioning in her post at THE CONFLUENCE and I thought it would be best to bring it over here to Stray Dogs.... because I am already in the process of trying to define what Feminism is *in the positive.* Rather than pointing out what it is not.

My own response waxes philosophical:

"Keep in mind that “racism” or “sexism” are negative concepts… and, as such, they are easier to define. Cuz it’s much easier to pinpoint what we do *not* like about a person’s behavior/ worldview… than what we do.

Feminism, being a positive concept, is harder to delineate. We mostly know what it is *not.* And we have a hard time saying what it is.

Like the concept of the “good mother.” We don’t really know for sure what she looks like. But we sure know who is not her!

All that said… here are some things that a Feminist is NOT:

*A Feminist is NOT about tearing other women down for having a different take on certain issues.

*Feminism is not about belittling other women’s feelings because they are unlike our own.

*Feminism is not about taking part in high-faluting ceremonial signings, while still paying your own female employees less.

*Feminism is not groping cardboard breasts while laughing at our Secretary of State. "




Some other responses in the thread at The Confluence:

Okasha Skatsi answered Boomer's six questions point blank:

"1. Of course you can be a feminist if you attack other feminists on their ideology. You just won’t be a very effective or useful one.

2. No way in hell.

3. Possible; feminists can make mistakes, just like anyone else can. Unlikely, though, if the delusion persists.

4. If you attack the woman as a woman, no. Case in point: I can abhor Sarah Palin’s wolf-slaughter and drilling policies and call her out on them as cruel and mistaken. I can do it, though, without calling her a c*nt, a bimbo, a MILF, a whore, hanging her in effigy or claiming that her youngest child is her daughter’s. (I was online the night that particular lie came oozing to the surface. I watched as it was invented and perpetuated on DU and DK by people who knew they were lying. The Democratic Party’s treatment of Hillary drove me out of the party; their treatment of Sarah Palin insures I’ll never go back.)

5. No, but see above. I’m not much on the theory in any case.

6. Another clear case of no way in hell."





Dakinkat was anecdotal in her treatment of the query, and her experience is not unlike many of ours:

"for as long as i can remember there’s been this debate on what is a real feminist?

I remember sitting in my philosophy of feminism class as a sophomore at university in the mid 70s and being absolutely berated by my lesbian seperatist prof just because i was married–in her view, just hanging out with men, let alone marrying one was enough to disqualify me

then later in the 80s, i had the same sort’ve argument pushed on me… i was not radical enough of a feminist to serve in NOW … and a lot of it had to do with my status as a married woman with children and little else …

Now, I’m being told i’m clueless on feminist theory, when basically i spent all of the 70s and 80s in the trenches to change rape laws, pass the ERA, stop the assault on abortion rights and support civil rights for GLBTs. I just don’t get it … when I ran for office, i got labeled a radical feminist who marches in the streets! When I talked to purists, I’m a sell out … wtf?"





I think we can all recognize one thing. Feminism *is* hard to define. We know what it is not, when we see something that rubs us raw, or makes our stomachs knot up. If I had decided to post a series of "Not Feminists" here in my blog, I'd have easy pickings. Some would even say that posting a photo of Sarah Palin's, apparently uncomfortable shoes, is "not feminist." And I respect that. Though don't necessarily agree.

At Feminism's core is the concept of "self definition." I think that is key. And, perhaps, that is what rubbed so many of us the wrong way about the "Obama Superman" issue of Ms. Magazine. I, personally, have never heard Mr. Obama call himself a Feminist. Have you?

If I had heard him stand up against Bernie Mac and say "Hey, man, I'm a Feminist!" instead of "Hey, man, I'm just messin' witchu" .... I'd be a whole lot more comfortable with that depiction.

Or, if President Obama had challenged Jay Z on the "99 Problems" song by saying something like ... "Look, I'm a Feminist and I don't want anyone talking about my daughters like that," I might be celebrating the inaugural issue of Ms. Mag, instead of resisting it.


I'll end this post by linking to Wikipedia's LIST OF FEMINISTS. Take a long look and see if there are some you agree or don't agree about. In the meantime, I'll just pull up some of their photos and post them here for your approval (or not.)

Peace,

SYD

Pictured: Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Starhawk, Camille Paglia, and John Lennon.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

It Is Not About Hillary Anymore, It Is About NOT Hillary

I was proud of Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday. The way she handled her SoS hearing was, as all of her endeavors are, impeccable.

Of course, we have to go outside the mainstream to understand just how strong and intelligent Ms. Clinton was. Quite honestly, I am as tired as is Rev. Bergman.. of the "Hillary Hate." I am fatigued from hearing the MSM talkers, over and over, question Bill's foundation. How will it impact Hillary's work? Blah, blah, blah. As if no spouse of a diplomat has ever done overseas business before.

Further, I am sick to death of Yahoo slathering photos like this on their home page:



I mean, seriously... of all the photos in their bank, THIS is the one that pops up when I open my e-mail? C'mon boys.... you're not covering your propaganda very well. I can so clearly see that you want me to be afraid... so afraid... of the Clinton Women.

What a joke.

So, this morning I opened up my "news" from The Confluence. (No thanks on the Yahoo reports from AP fellas.) I got to thinking.... ya know, it's true... for me.... IT'S JUST NOT ABOUT HILLARY ANY MORE.

No. It is not about Hillary anymore. It is about NOT Hillary. What her absence from the position of POTUS means to me, and the rest of our god-forsaken world. A world so in need of healing and peace.

It’s about a world where women and children suffer the abuses of corporations at a more profound rate than do men. Where women are paid less for doing the same work. Where women are expected to care for their children with those lower salaries. Often, bearing the burden alone.

It’s about what happens when one, high profile, woman helps us carry that burden. She tries to help us all rise up from under it. And then other so called "feminists" join with our oppressors and keep her down. While elevating a man who has done nothing… AND I DO MEAN NOTHING to advance the causes of women and children.

It is not about Hillary. It is about NOT Hillary. That is what it’s about.

And it's about why I have to ORDER THESE BUTTONS, and wear them to raise consciousness: